Kindiki Defends Judge Removal Process as Constitutional
Deputy President Kithure Kindiki insists that the removal of judges is a constitutional process, not a political or ethnic issue. He urges critics to follow legal channels, indirectly countering Rigathi Gachagua’s resistance to CJ Koome’s ouster. Meanwhile, the Judicial Service Commission reviews petitions against multiple judges, including Koome.
Saved Content

Deputy President Kithure Kindiki has weighed in on the heated debate over the removal of judges, refuting claims of political interference in the judiciary. In a statement on his X account, Kindiki emphasized that ousting a judge is a constitutional process, not a political or ethnic issue. His remarks come amid concerns over the alleged targeting of Chief Justice Martha Koome.

Kindiki urged both critics and defenders of embattled judges to follow legal channels instead of resorting to public incitement. He criticized those injecting ethnicity into the matter, questioning who stands up for judges who may be innocent but lack political backing. His message appeared to be a subtle rebuke to former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who had vowed to resist Koome’s removal.

Speaking in Meru, Gachagua accused President William Ruto of orchestrating Koome’s ouster and warned of mass action if she is removed. He claimed that Koome was under attack for refusing to be a puppet of the administration and declared that Ruto would not be welcome in Meru if the Chief Justice is dismissed.

Meanwhile, the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) confirmed receiving five petitions against Supreme Court and High Court judges, including Koome. JSC Vice Chairperson Isaac Rutto revealed that lawyer Nelson Havi had filed a petition citing gross misconduct. If found credible, the JSC could recommend the formation of a tribunal to determine the judges fate.

You Might Also Like

Stay Connected

Get Newsletter

Advertisement